Have you
ever wondered why someone takes on an alias? I can think of a myriad of
reasons. There is one thing in common: all of these reasons are tied to the
person who takes on this alias: his person, his personal life and his life
within a community, and also aspects like tradition and ‘fashion’. The basic
questions here are: ‘why’ and ‘why this specific alias’? Because the choice of
an alias is always the choice of the person involved.
Let’s turn to the alias which Christian Emil
Marie (Emil) Küpper (1883-1931) chose as an artist: Theo van Doesburg. He was one
of the chief promoters of De Stijl and Dada. Van Doesburg also used other
aliases in his life: I.K. Bonset and Aldo Camini. Until I
researched his youth (in 1999-2000), no art historian had really questioned the
personal reasons behind Emil Küpper’s choice of the alias ‘Theo van Doesburg’. His genealogy provided the only plausible
answer. Moreover: family circumstances also gave rise to new hypotheses about,
and possible answers to, why Emil Küpper had such explosive relationships with
his fellow-artists.
Let’s turn to the alias which Christian Emil
Marie (Emil) Küpper (1883-1931) chose as an artist: Theo van Doesburg. He was one
of the chief promoters of De Stijl and Dada. Van Doesburg also used other
aliases in his life: I.K. Bonset and Aldo Camini. Until I
researched his youth (in 1999-2000), no art historian had really questioned the
personal reasons behind Emil Küpper’s choice of the alias ‘Theo van Doesburg’. His genealogy provided the only plausible
answer. Moreover: family circumstances also gave rise to new hypotheses about,
and possible answers to, why Emil Küpper had such explosive relationships with
his fellow-artists.